> without burning 10 years of cash flow.
Wasn't Apple sitting on a pile of cash and having no good ideas what to spend it on?
Wasn't Apple sitting on a pile of cash and having no good ideas what to spend it on?
Edit: especially given that Apple doesn’t do b2b so all the spend would be just to make consumer products
They still generate about ~$100 billion in free cash per year, that is plowed into the buybacks.
They could spend more cash than every other industry competitor. It's ludicrous to say that they would have to burn 10 years of cash flow on trivial (relative) investment in model development and training. That statement reflects a poor understanding of Apple's cash flow.