1. It does not necessarily provide any feedback that you understand as such. You can THINK you are pushing of the door perfectly straight, while it is actually SILENTLY re-aligning the force along the plane of the slot. The only feedback you are getting is that the door is opening or not opening, you aren't getting feedback about the how the slot is "making judgements."

2. It seems to me you have arbitrarily applied the word "judgement" here rather than basing your usage on a rigorous operational definition. You don't define "raw intent", either, or what it means to "override" it. I suggest you read The Shape of Actions, if you haven't already. It is an example of how to make clean distinctions. Harry Collins distinguishes between mimeomorphic and polimorphic actions in a way that clarifies what can and cannot be automated.

3. You haven't defined "ontological deception" and the term does not make sense to me on its face. It's not a term of art that is in common use. Remaining sovereign simply has to do with having a operating mental model. I don't see what you mean by "whispering" or why I should care. That sounds more like poetry than technology.

You should really try to explain more of your jargon if you care to be understood. Also, cite your sources.