Hacker News Reader

> suppress free speech

Without X, people can't speak their mind in public? Come on, dude.

I beleive the free speech he refers to is posting of undressed images.

Of children. And deepfake revenge porn.

I doubt that, given the prohibitions he's got in the Grok EULA.

The EULA is just there to keep up appearances. If he really cared he would have stopped this before it became widespread.

Neither he nor anyone else has the tech that could stop the legal use without also stopping the legal use.

And yet some of the other AI developers have managed to at the very least make the illegal use a lot more challenging to achieve. And to enforce their ToS against those who do deliberately and persistently violate those restrictions and safeguards.

> And yet some of the other AI developers have managed to at the very least make the illegal use a lot more challenging to achieve

... yet remain unable to detect consent for an undressing, or age for CSAM.

As for violating safeguards, well, if they are violatable then they are not safeguards.

Correction: Neither he nor anyone else has the tech that could stop the illegal use without also stopping the legal use.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com