Hacker News Reader

Obviously more than just tone. Based on the lack of structure and wording it's clearly substantially AI written.

The article mentions two vulnerabilities. One was remediated June 2025. The other has not been remediated.

I hate that every article nowadays has to be judged on whether it's AI or not.

So annoying.

I'd like to read stuff written by a human. I know other people like reading LLM output. I don't see what's wrong with telling people whether it's AI-written or not.

> I know other people like reading LLM output.

I haven’t met any of these people; I’m sure some may exist but does anyone actually “like” rather than “tolerate” LLM writing? Anybody have a link to a decent study or survey on this area?

For me it's not about "is this AI", it's "this writing is obnoxious and disrespectful of the reader, and here's why I think AI is likely at the root of it."