I do so as well, especially if there is any discussion of AI models.
If it's Claude someone says how Qwen is better, if it's Codex, someone says Claude is better, if it's Gemini someone says OpenAI is better. I get it, it's all a battle of the most users as more users=more finetuning, but goodness lord.
Everything is one overfitted mess and I can't bear read the comments anymore. Shill after shill
do you think they are really bots / automated or might it be that due to growing user-base quality might level down towards a more general internet platform quality? (i have no idea how to distinguish the two without logs / metrics so i have no clue, just a thought)
i dont think its general internet platform quality, especially on political stuff hacker news feels more like bluesky rather than X thats why i feel like its bots just commenting not real humans. ofc theres no metric, just how i feel. and humans like if ur comment has basic common sense in it, it gets down voted haard