At which point the discussion simply derails into a debate over whether you believe limitations to freedom of speech are ever acceptable.

As another note, don't forget to consider the second element- "temporary safety". If the safety purchased by showing greater deference to militant Islamism is not temporary, the quote is not applicable.

I am not arguing that this is the case, merely reminding to think critically- his quote was very specific, and it aggravates me when people abuse it without a moment's thought.

Anyway, I know what I believe, but I don't have the material to make a case right now, so that is all.