Comment by xp84 | Hacker News Reader

Comment by xp84 | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Look, I don’t think there’s a good reason to attempt to take it in the first place, especially when a friendly ally already controls it without any threats of any kind happening (compared to say, the Cuban Missile Crisis for the opposite situation).

However, the rest of NATO has nothing to gain from throwing their whole military at the US in the Western Hemisphere. They certainly can’t win that conflict, so what would be the point? Just to kill hundreds of thousands of their troops?

They should know that the Americans aren’t going to kill the residents anyway, so it’s really just an idiotic dick-waving contest that Trump wants. The smart move would be to diplomatically retaliate and just screw with the US economically, to extract a concession from the next US President, who won’t have such obtuse ideas and will be eager to make the consequence of this self-inflicted jackassery (like no Americans allowed to visit the EU, EU regulators banning Google and Apple devices, etc) go away.

The point would be to stop an aggressor before it gets worse. I’m not saying they’d attack the mainland or anything like that, but they would side, militarily, against us.

looks like there's at least some opposition over there:

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/01/07/politics/the-gops-growing-di...

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/01/07/politics/greenland-thom-till...

When the time comes, they will get on board, just like they always do. The only appropriate and convincing response would have come ages ago and went something like “are you a fucking lunatic?”

Tillis doesn't put it quite so bluntly, but he comes close:

> “I’m sick of stupid,” a fiery Tillis declared in the Senate. ... he told his colleagues that Miller’s comments were “absurd.”

> “Mr. Miller said that the US government – obviously Greenland should be part of the US. That is absurd,” he said.

> Tillis also ... “What makes me cranky? Stupid. ...

I mean, he's a politician, so he tries to throw Miller under the bus (instead of admitting the stupid rots like a fish), and he claims he's the only one speaking his mind because of his committee (not because he's retiring and doesn't worry about being primaried), but I find absurd stupidity comes close to fucking lunacy.

Then again, I thought GWB and his posse were fucking lunatics, and now I've had to reevaluate their statesmanship.

> the next US President

One nice thing about US Americans: they're always so optimistic!

One day Rabinovich is browsing the local news site, as is his habit, and he clicks it away but somehow a chatbot still pops up on his screen:

— Moishe :tada:, we notice that you only come to our site once a day, and not only do you not doomscroll, you don't even scroll past the fold. :-( Is there anything we could do to improve your engagement?

— No, no, I only come to check the obituaries.

— But the obituaries are in their own section, linked from the footer. You never even see the footer!

— Believe you me, this obituary will be above the fold.

> what would be the point?

a Danish poem from 1940:

  Losing one glove is certainly painful, but nothing compared to the pain,
  of losing one, throwing away the other, and finding the first one again.

> in the Western Hemisphere.

(a) we've heard "spheres of influence" before, and seen Fall Blau happen anyway. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpE_xMRiCLE

(b) distances:

  1'400 km  Nuuk <-> Reykjavik*
  3'300 km  Nuuk <-> Washington DC

Just saying, dude.

* I saw a map in a major US paper last night that somehow was missing Iceland completely. Do you all even have fact checkers anymore?

Indeed this concept of hemispheres to justify military action is total nonsense, the Prime Meridian could have been placed anywhere. Strictly speaking, the whole of Ireland may be invaded by the USA according to this "doctrine".

Thanks to HN, a little time ago I learned that my original conception of the Monroe Doctrine (donroe mocktrine?) was overly simplistic. Yay HN!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41564406

(who'd want to invade IE anyway? They have no culture beyond a pair of shite gaelic rappers and they're so backward they still travel on horseback: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljPFZrRD3J8 )

> hemispheres to justify military action

I didn't mean to imply that. I was only speaking of how pragmatic it would be for European powers to handle the logistics to fight a land war in Greenland. The US can project power basically anywhere, but it's harder for smaller navies to pull that off.

See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46539021 for the pragmatics.

As far as the logistics go: in 1982 the UK managed to land several regiments on the Mal^W Falkland Islands (13'000 km); surely it'd be easier to do similar, over much shorter distances?

Note: if AR (a client state* of the US at the time) had been hoping the Monroe Doctrine would be put into practice for them, that hope was in vain.

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_War

Regarding hemisphere - Sorry, I just meant that countries that aren't the US have limited long-distance power projection abilities and limited sustained logistics capabilities. That's because the US has been policing every ocean for 50 years while the other navies have been mainly sailing around to keep an eye on their territorial waters.

Anyway, does Reykjavik have a big military logistics depot?

Have you heard the joke that ends "I don't have to outrun the bear"?

I went to elementary school in the US, and it was there that I learned how you have to handle bullies. You don't have to be able to beat them up, you only have to make them work[0] hard enough to beat you up[1] that they start picking on someone who is more fun and less work to abuse[2].

[0] when I told my wife how "calling someone out" worked in the States, she was horrified: she said, yes, of course the boys here fight, but they fight in anger, spontaneously — what kind of barbarians make notes in their agendas to kick each others' ass, in cold blood, later?

[1] the better kind of bully only goes to first blood. Worse are the O'Briens (read "Such, such were the joys" and you may understand were that character comes from) who continue beating you up just so others see they can:

> "Even if people stop rebelling against the party, the Party will manufacture new traitors so that it can be seen crushing them."

Either way, even though I lost every single fight, no one picked on me again after I'd called them out. (bullies are not into schlep?)

[2] yes, maybe in hindsight it would have been better to stand up for those they switched to. My wife was also horrified by "snitches get stitches". In practice, JFK tried to create a world in which the strong were just, the weak secure, and the peace protected, but obviously others in the US didn't care for those goals.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com