Hacker News Reader

Comment by gyomu | Hacker News Reader

> is it realistic these days to just expect software to write once and run forever?

Yes, but you have to put a bit of effort to make it so. For example, if you write your software as a ROM for an early game console (SNES/GBA/etc.), you can probably expect it to run for a very long time, as there will likely be people who want to play Final Fantasy 6 and Pokémon Silver for as long as computers are around.

That's one extreme, but you don't have to go that far. I have some HTML/CSS/JS projects (meant to run locally) from the 2000s that still work totally fine today. Same for Python code from 2010, etc. I wouldn't be surprised if those still worked just fine 50 years from now.

All I do is write code that is meant to run locally first, with very minimal dependencies, only choosing to use conservative/proven technologies.

View on HN

DOSBox! Super stable APIs that will never change. And it self-hosts compilers and editors (up to latest versions of Emacs and at least versions of vim from earlier this century) so anywhere your code can run you can also modify and recompile it.

(In practice I edit my code outside of DOSBox, and sometimes I use cross-compilers, but it is good to know that there is a fallback.)

> there will likely be people who want to play Final Fantasy 6 and Pokémon Silver for as long as computers are around

Is Final Fantasy 6 seeing a lot on new players today? Old games are played more by the people who enjoyed them when they were new. Even the landmark games are easily forgotten and younger players will never bother when they have so many modern choices.

> Even the landmark games are easily forgotten and younger players will never bother when they have so many modern choices.

www.gog.com

Features regularly on HN

The Titan submersible implosion features a lot on HN, and almost nobody here built such a contraption, or took one to the bottom of the ocean, or imploded. Naming a gaming storefront which may sell an old game doesn't answer the question whether young people want to play it.

My reasonable baseline assumption is that almost no young player is going to jump to play a 30+ year old game. I'll be generous here and not name things like Frogger or worse, The Oregon Trail. But give a kid who has seen modern games a copy of Diablo, or SimCity 2000, or even newer things like or GoldenEye 007 or System Shock and watch the "excitement". And these are the heavy hitters.

A lot of these oldies didn't age well even for the people who loved them way back when. It's hard to get young players excited about them. Very few oldies could stand on their own today.

The modern choices are accompanied by ads and gambling, to the point that it wouldn't be surprising if Final Fantasy 6 was seeing an uptick. Go enjoy your "modern" games all you like, but it doesn't always matter if a games community is growing, especially if it's not one requiring connectivity to blast ads and skins at people.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com