(I think 1.9 USD is more realistic than 19 USD for now. I don't want to say the product is bad, it is hard to evaluate it at 19 USD for this simple interaction. For a QA simulation with multiple choices seems quite pricey)
The intention is that the license covers the Full Library (I'm building 12+ scenarios covering Firing, Performance Reviews, Hiring, etc.).
But your comment proves I failed to communicate that scope more better on the landing page. It looks like a 'Single Level' purchase right now, which is definitely not the value prop. I will revisit my messaging. Thanks for the heads up.
I work for a company which I also think the content is worth and people don't pay. And we charge much much less than that.
The problem we identified, though debatable, is that people consider three things:
1. Exclusivity 2. Comparison 3. Alternatives
1. Is this a thing a thing only available here 2. That's not what it seems. People thinks that 15 USD for netflix is ok, but they think that everything that costs 15 USD should be stream content high production with tons of options. So if you give text, the expect cheap or free
3. If I cannot get what is being offered, can I get something about the same for free?
Anyway Good luck there man
My current logic: I'm optimizing for the individual dev/lead paying out of pocket who wants to start now without asking a manager for approval. The goal is to be below the 'mental friction' threshold for a personal impulse buy.
But for a Team/Enterprise version (where the manager buys it for 5 people), you are absolutely right—the pricing structure needs to look very different.