So that you can then use that account, which is tied to your biometrics, for lawbreaking?
Wut?
So that you can then use that account, which is tied to your biometrics, for lawbreaking?
Wut?
Account creation requires biometric face-scan.
https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/SwipeHelper/search?q=hinge+sel...
Maybe you're getting lucky and not tickling their risk-based nonsense, but now that this article has been posted they'll certainly crank that knob up to 11.
You probably don't use Hinge. The verification is not necessary at all. It's merely used to "verify" your identity to other users. It has no bearing on what I cover in the post.
Edit: e.g. via residential proxy IPs and a bunch of cheap Android phones
There is an extremely profitable company (whose data hoard keeps geting hacked but why should they care?) built around this:
https://www.au10tix.com/
Most apps use device attestation (derived from secure boot) to make sure the video stream is really coming from a front-facing camera on a physical device. If Hinge isn't doing this yet they surely will be in 5, 4, 3, 2...Fundamentally no amount of front facing camera on a physical device or other shenanigan a company might do can really do anything about it?
They don't feed it a video clip. They hold the camera in front of a screen playing the video. Use a low-end phone with a blurry camera to increase your chances.
Neural networks are very, very, very good at detecting this.
It's much easier than detecting "liveness" (for whatever definition of that term you subscribe to).