Hacker News Reader

Comment by ekjhgkejhgk | Hacker News Reader

I feel like I'm taking pills, but hear me out.

If there's one thing we learned from the Snowden leaks is that the NSA can't break GPG.

Look at it from the POV of someone who like me isn't an expert: on the one hand I have ivory tower researchers telling me that GPG is "bad". On the other hand I have fact that the most advanced intelligence in the world can't break it. My personal conclusion is that GPG is actually fucking awesome.

What am I missing?

View on HN

My impression is that GPG when used correctly is secure. But there are so many problems with it that the chances of shooting yourself with one of the footguns is too high for it to be a reliable solution.

The alternatives support newer encryption methods but nothing has fundamentally changed that doesn't make them less secure, but they have less footguns to worry about.

The weakest link in cryptography is always people.

The NSA can't break GPG assuming everything is working properly. This blog post (which to be fair I only skimmed) explains that GPG is a mess which could lead to things not working properly, and also gives real life examples. You may also want to see https://gpg.fail (you can tell they're from the ivory tower by the cat ears). The blog post also mentions bad UX, which you and I can directly appreciate (if anything I might expect ivory tower types to dismiss UX issues).

I am well familiar with that presentation at CCC. Yes, the presentation are by people who live in the low stakes world of theoreticals as you can tell by the cat ears.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com