Oh I'm paying attention. But I also stay quiet publicly. Speaking out is a way to get the hammer.
Theres different ways to protest. Being an obvious target isn't what I do.
Theres different ways to protest. Being an obvious target isn't what I do.
> Theres different ways to protest. Being an obvious target isn't what I do.
How do you reconcile those two statements?
A lot of people get angry when I call out people as liars, but sometimes these people are just fucking lying to everyone and you have to call a spade a spade.
Pay close attention to section "General Interference with Organizations and Production" pages 28-32.
> "Its why I can insult and talk terrible of president Turnip (spit) and not fear the gulag."
But then you say:
> "But I also stay quiet publicly. Speaking out is a way to get the hammer."
In other words, you're afraid to exercise your first amendment rights. You feel that you can't, in fact "insult and talk terrible of president Turnip" without unacceptable consequences.
He is lying or suffering cognitive dissonance.
You cannot rectify his statements in another way, beyond the third option that calls his mental faculties into question.
I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt and assuming he’s mentally all there, but that leads to my aforementioned options for them.