> but decades of feedback, tuning and fixing
On the contrary, this is likely the reason why we can disrupt these large players.
Experience from 2005 just don't hold that much value in 2025 in tech.
On the contrary, this is likely the reason why we can disrupt these large players.
Experience from 2005 just don't hold that much value in 2025 in tech.
So the things you mention indeed is experience you need to get rid of as you move to other software stacks and other technologies.
But taking out features are difficult - even when they have near to zero value.
Why it sometimes make sense for new players to enter the market and start over - without the legacy.
This is indeed one of the value propositions in the startup I work in.
That would be why a significant portion of the world's critical systems still run on Windows XP, eh?