The problem I'm trying to solve: a student writes an essay, gets flagged by a detector, and now has to prove a negative. An artist posts work, gets accused in the comments, and has no way to show their process. The burden of proof has shifted to creators, and there's no good tool for that. You could argue "good work speaks for itself" and historically that was true. But we're in a transition period where the default assumption is shifting. Even if AI detection eventually improves or people learn to distinguish quality, right now creators are getting caught in the crossfire. Realwork is less about "AI bad" and more about giving creators receipts when they need them. Whether that need persists long-term, I'm genuinely not sure. But the pain is real today.
Curious, do you think the accusation climate is temporary, or does it become a permanent feature of how we evaluate work?