Disagree wholeheartedly.

The only relevant litmus test is:

"Did the accused party commit the offense they are accused of?"

...everything else is whataboutism, red herring, ad hominem, and DARVO.

If the worlds worst person says 2+2=4, you still can't evaluate that claim by testing how many people like or hate the person. Only by whether the content of their words is true or false.