Proton/electron mass ratio pure geometry – 10⁻¹³% error, zero free parameters

I've spent 20 years on this and I think I finally have something. The proton/electron mass ratio (1836.152...) isn't a free parameter. It's geometry: k = log₂(reduced_Compton_wavelength / Planck_length)

k_proton = 63.496 k_electron = 74.339

mass_ratio = 2^(k_electron - k_proton) = 2^10.843 = 1836.1526734400 experimental = 1836.1526734400 error = 2.6 × 10⁻¹³ % That's it. No fitting. No parameters. The ratio of any two particle masses is just 2^Δk. The framework (I call it LFM) is built on 4 axioms and 1 scaling law:

P_k = P₀ × 4^(-k) L_k = L_p × 2^k Anchored at k=66 (nuclear scale)

Everything derives from this. Mass hierarchies, the 200× pressure differential in hadrons, material properties. I built a materials simulator using these principles: https://github.com/KeithLuton/LFM-Resonant-materials-lab The Python proof is 10 lines. Run it yourself. I'm an independent researcher (read: broke, facing foreclosure). But the math is the math. Either I'm wrong and someone can show me where, or this is real. Curious what HN thinks.