Since backdating would be one of the ways to fake this, the onus lies in those that claim the prediction was legit.
That's how evidence works for extraordinary claims. Alas, scientific rigor is a harsh master.
That's how evidence works for extraordinary claims. Alas, scientific rigor is a harsh master.
There's a reason RV is considered pseudoscience.
It speaks volumes you don't see any problem with the lack of proof that the documents weren't backdated, and get defensive when people tell you this must absolutely be ruled out if we're ever to even start considering your alleged evidence.