there will be a chapter some day on the link or limit between human involvement and emotion, and the economic value of something
for 2000 years we removed some hardship to improve everything but everything automated seems like an economic blackhole
for 2000 years we removed some hardship to improve everything but everything automated seems like an economic blackhole
The two are not the same. The connection between the two has seemingly been lost.
I know it's considered a dirty word in many circles nowadays, but by far the most effective means we know of disincentivizing a singleminded focus on the accumulation of wealth is to make that number something you can't keep pushing up after a certain point.
No human being will ever be genuinely discouraged from making a better product or making themselves better at doing something because they couldn't turn their (personal, not company) $30 million/year into $300 million/year. Because a) at those numbers, the only material difference is the number; your lifestyle won't change appreciably, and b) if you actually cared about making a better product or making yourself better at doing a thing in the first place, that kind of extra money (or lack thereof) wouldn't be important enough to change that.