After "AI": Anticipating a post-LLM science and technology revolution
evalapply.org
evalapply.org
[1]. https://ithy.com/article/data-center-gpu-lifespan-explained-...
Even after that, what does a "burned out" GPU look like. Is it a total bust, or is still usable at... say, 25% capacity for "consumer type applications"?
Thank you for that GPU lifespan explanation... taught me a thing or two today.
From what a hear it's a mix, of completely dead to degraded performance.
> Training is harsher than inference is harsher than speculative capacity-hoarding (because, competition).
I have heard over 70% quoted used for training, and like 5% for general purpose inference and the rest for code generation. But don't quote me on these numbers, I don't recall the sources. One has to assume that some capacity is also used for traditional high performance computing.
What could substitute LLM demand, if the LLM/AI business contracts rapidly?
Groq investor sounds alarm on data centers (axios.com)
32 points by giuliomagnifico 2 hours ago | 21 comments
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46432791> Venture capitalist Alex Davis is "deeply concerned" that too many data centers are being built without guaranteed tenants, according to a letter being sent this morning to his investors.
> [snip]
> What he's saying: "The 'build it and they will come' strategy is a trap. If you are a hyperscaler, you will own your own data centers. We foresee a significant financing crisis in 2027–2028 for speculative landlords."
Seems to me for it to really go wild the bottleneck to overcome would need to include GPU experts too cheap to meter also.