This is how money works. You're expressing anger at the concept of personal property. Yes, those who have more money can afford more expensive goods -- that's the whole point!
The money raised by auctioning access is of some public benefit, but is it enough to offset the deep unfairness of the public granting, for example, software engineers a shorter commute on average than teachers?
A dog-eats-dog jungle of underdeveloped monkeys in clothing, on the other hand, sure.
> for example, software engineers a shorter commute on average than teachers?
Housing prices already have this kind of effect -- highly compensated employees can afford to live closer to their preferred locations. There's no reason not to allocate road resources to the users who are willing to pay for them (which is a much broader segment of the population than just software engineers). Pricing is a better system than road communism.
If you're in SF and you get a call that your mother is in the hospital in SJ and it's 5pm, you would happily pay $100 in tolls to get there (I think the actual price is less than $20).
Unfortunately, there is no practical way to do this other than by charging money to use the fast lane, and this means that the rich will get more of the scarce resources than the poor.
This is no big deal - it's kind of a tautology, if you really think about it.
The standard Econ solution is to set a price that maximizes throughput. At least some toll roads are attempting to hit that price.
https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freewaymgmt/hovguidance/chapter4.ht...
This covers pretty much all of the lanes that people complain about so I'll stand by what I said.
The "this is how money works" argument doesn't work well for chattel slavery and it doesn't work well for this either...