Still the same flaw in his analysis. Humans are unreliable too and the entire damn economy runs on them. You just need good enough, and AI is getting better daily.
It can write my code a bit less shitty tomorrow, but that doesn't sound like the fulfillment of the promises given.
Tomorrow, another company will yet again fail to integrate agentic workflows.
Even with current abilities if they're just rolled out it's still trillions of the economy.
A bit like OK Waymo isn't perfect but it works in SF...we don't need a giant breakthrough to bring it to another 1000 cities.
Everyone is focused on how to make the models better (rightly), but impact and economic viability is in implementation and there is a lot of low hanging fruit there.
>another company will yet again fail to integrate agentic workflows.
'tis true
Well, a lot of cities have snow, or different flora and fauna, or different road rules (Karachi, Mexico City). Maybe the same approach works (spend hellacious amounts of money to train) but again, for what economic benefit?