Congress seems to keep growing so perhaps this is just serving a broader audience. But knowing a lot of long-time attendees, I'm certainly not alone in thinking Congress is starting to be less interesting than it used to be. I'm certainly not trying to say the event sucks though, there's still a plenty of interesting stuff happening.
Let's be real, the videos get far to much eyes to break the law. There are smaller talks and groups where it looks different.
Nowadays you cannot do that anymore, because most visitors are non-technical. Nobody respects the photo policy. Everyone judges your actions through their political lens. Instead all the "action" happens elsewhere and CCC became much more about social stuff, talking and politics. And of course about policing and judging other peoples' politics.
And making stuff up that was never talked about there to start a political movement to get that party banned? Yeah nice democracy and journalism there.
https://rsw.beck.de/aktuell/daily/meldung/detail/lg-hamburg-...
But what does this have to do with your suggestion that I should ask the court whether you were at the meeting?
>whether you were at the meeting?
Where you? You are clearly missing the point.