Why Smart People Have Bad Ideas
paulgraham.com
paulgraham.com
http://web.archive.org/web/19961226071744/http://www.artix.c...
This is apparently a year into their venture, but I think they'd already abandoned the idea at this point. Notice the ad on the top for Viaweb.
I notice our pitch to galleries
http://web.archive.org/web/19961227091110/www.artix.com/how....
has a lot in common with Viaweb's
I came across that a couple years ago when it showed up in one of the headers of an email posted somewhere on paulgraham.com, which I can no longer find.
"This is a controversial view. One expert on "entrepreneurship" told me that any startup had to include business people, because only they could focus on what customers wanted. I'll probably alienate this guy forever by quoting him, but I have to risk it, because his email was such a perfect example of this view:
"80% of MIT spinoffs succeed provided they have at least one management person in the team at the start. The business person represents the "voice of the customer" and that's what keeps the engineers and product development on track."
This is, in my opinion, a crock. Hackers are perfectly capable of hearing the voice of the customer without a business person to amplify the signal for them. Larry Page and Sergey Brin were grad students in computer science, which presumably makes them "engineers." Do you suppose Google is only good because they had some business guy whispering in their ears what customers wanted? It seems to me the business guys who did the most for Google were the ones who obligingly flew Altavista into a hillside just as Google was getting started."
In the future can we expect to see a fund for a) a standard search engine and b) a standard social network....
b) Same thing here. It's hard to beat facebook as far as a general interest social network. There needs to be something unique.