It remains an interesting challenge to prove that more rigorously, of course.
It remains an interesting challenge to prove that more rigorously, of course.
I'd put my money on a hypothesis that says causality is enforced whether we can perceive it or not. Say we had such a computer with FTL circuitry. You attempt to instruct the computer to halt the current program when an answer is received, thus preventing the inputs being supplied that would produce the given output. Our current time-based perception says "paradox" whereas this proposed hypothesis would say "the computer simply will not halt the program," not because it's designed with safeguards, but because the laws of physics maintain causality.
The same argument could have been waged against the heliocentric model. Occam's razor is not a natural law after all.
Yup.