eBay announces site redesign and Pinterest-like discovery feed.
thenextweb.com
thenextweb.com
These new changes are great because one of eBay's long-hidden assets is it's product images. It hosts more unique product photos than pretty much any other company out there and for a long time, it surfaced those product images as 140px x 140px thumbnails. Focusing on showing larger, higher-quality images is going to be a big win for users.
That being said, I don't have much confidence in their feed setup. eBay is trying to create an entirely new browsing behavior and while it will definitely result in new sales (how could it not over the old homepage?), the mashup up of a users varied interests into one feed is incredibly disorienting. I just loaded up a couple of interests (biking, guitars, and baseball) and I'm seeing a hodgepodge of handbar grips, random baseball cards, and really nice Les Pauls. While the format seems nice, the content isn't really there yet--and the content, i.e. the quality and relevancy of listings surfaced isn't going to be carried by the format alone.
That said, I'm sure there'll be a C&D from eBay in 5, 4, 3, 2...
What they're missing is a 'reject' button that would allow people to easily dismiss things they don't want to see. I don't always know what I want on a home page, and I appreciate the suggestions that can be algorithmically generated from my previous and ongoing activity. But I usually know instinctively what I don't want. Sadly, eBay provides me with no way to communicate that, even though it would free up space for more well-targeted (and therefore valuable) suggestions. They're not the only company with this problem.
The problem with product suggestions is that they're limited by computers' inability to model the purpose of things. For example, we bought our first house last year, and as a result I ended up owning a lot more tools, having a subscription to a DIY magazine, and so on. Now every time I go on eBay or Amazon I get lots of suggestions for things for like power tools, based on this major change in my shopping activity over the last year. Fair enough, except that once I have bought a good drill, I probably don't need another one. Sure, I bought several power tools for different things, but having acquired the basic necessities it's not like I want to keep collecting them. Instead of showing me more tools, the smart thing now would be to start showing me accessories like drill bits and saw blades, which need regular replacement and have higher profit margins. But most shopping algorithms seem unable to effectively model product associations, distinguish between total and marginal profits, or usage patterns. Most attempts at the latter seem to involve expert systems, whereas I suspect the right approach is a multiscalar one (but now I am running up against my ignorance of the proper terminology).
The Pinterest style image feeds can work in some cases (probably most for the items being sold on eBay) but not others. Imagine you are looking for RAM modules, harddisks or similar items which all look the same. A table with data showing capacity etc. is essential in that case. Also ordering is essential.