Chicago auctioning away its parking revenue for 75 years for a mere $1.6B was a far bigger mistake and curse upon the public. At least the chromebooks have a far shorter lifetime
https://www.npr.org/2025/12/12/nx-s1-5642708/chicago-parking...
Chicago auctioning away its parking revenue for 75 years for a mere $1.6B was a far bigger mistake and curse upon the public. At least the chromebooks have a far shorter lifetime
https://www.npr.org/2025/12/12/nx-s1-5642708/chicago-parking...
Someone who read this comment but not the article could assume this was because demand increased unexpectedly. But someone interviewed for the article said the company increased rates and required payment where it was not required before.
Given that upcoming self-driving revolution likely means those parking spaces will have very little use, it may end up to be an unintentionally wise decision.
[1] https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/chicago-parking-meters...
Dismissing concerns of issues that affect people today with the promise of some solution that may or may not happen to the degree you think it may address the real problems of today is really not cool.
On other note, Chicago in winter may be icy driving. It may be harder to convince Chicagoans to join the “revolution” that sunny day Californians (or any other non-icy weather areas)
Depending on your perspective, you might see that as a boon to the cause of free parking.
They sold parking rate setting, collections, and towing to a mixture of Morgan Stanley and Abu Dhabi
I’m pretty sure they sold the street parking because of the underfunded obligations to previous employees.
These reports go further in depth, with comparisons to other governments:
https://www.truthinaccounting.org/resources/page/state-repor...
https://www.truthinaccounting.org/resources/page/city-report...