I do not understand the desire for everybody else in the world to act exactly like you. Variety is the spice of life.
I do not understand the desire for everybody else in the world to act exactly like you. Variety is the spice of life.
> I do not understand the desire for everybody else in the world to act exactly like you. Variety is the spice of life.
I don't want people to act exactly like me. I greatly appreciate the existence of people different from me with differing points of view and differing nations with differing cultures. This doesn't mean I have to like one specific archetype that I feel acts obnoxiously.
It's also natural to be uncomfortable because of the various references to sexual fetishes throughout the article.
"Feminizing" doesn't inherently refer to a sexual fetish but context matters. I invite you to examine the article more in depth, look at the chatroom conversations and then come to your own conclusion.
in the sense of "writing a brainfuck compiler in ed," not in making them so uncomfortable they beg for release. plus, "feminization" is not a fetish, at least in the sense of making rustc say "i love you;" that feels incredibly uncharitable.
all that to say, trans people (or anyone) shouldn't need to qualify their position (or very lighthearted, energetic opinion piece) with some genericizing disclaimer as to their identity, intents, etc., on the very basis of their identity. live and let live (i.e. fuck off)
[0] https://tr4nbie.substack.com/p/cat-ears-skater-skirts-and-kn...