I do this all the time. I pass my code into "you are a skeptic and hate all the code my student produces: here is their latest PR etc.. etc.."
I do agree that the tool we use (code rabbit) is a little too nitpicky, but it's right way more than it's wrong.
What sort of thing does it find? Bad smells (possibly known imperfections but least-bad-picks), bugs (maybe triaged), or violations of the coding guides (maybe known and waivered)?
I wonder if there’s a need for something like a RAG of known issues…