Assange brings 'instrument of war' case against Nobel Foundation
dailytelegraph.co.nz
dailytelegraph.co.nz
Which is in Norway.
He's a clown.
Don't care about him anymore.
It is hard to criticize what works, but the second witness appears to be their asset.. Managing a vulnerable person into a situation and then into filing a complaint.
That's the same argument suicidal maniacs use: "kill yourself now to avoid the problems of life" - otherwise known as the "silver lining of shit".
However, it's not clear why that should happen at the expense of NATO taxpayers, they are better off without maniac-serving wars.
Assange is the man though, sometimes I wonder if he's the only man in the West. Far too many don't seem to understand that sooner or later, the morbid obsession with wars is going to get back at them and bite their heads off.
Because I don't think it can work. The last time it was tried, we got Libya. Militaries have too much power nowadays, you can't invade and do a regime change without death and suffering for years until you have a strong and local insurgent force on the ground that you trust will leave the power once the coup is done. And Venezuela's rebelsare weak, poorly organised, and very few.
and what you say about balkas invaded? was it good or not? some of countries here are better now.
50 years of suffering vs few years of violent turbulence. what is better?
The only example where it "worked" without local resistance are Japan and Germany, and again, with Japan is highly debatable.
Venezuela is a jungle, and has tanks, APCs, and a lot of missiles. The military isn't one block, but it would react as one in case of an invasion. This also isn't Irak, with flat, arid places, and multiple insurgent group. Without the Kurd resistance in the north and local Shia resistance group, the operation would have fail. You ought to see Venezuela like Afghanistan, with less mountains. And invasion would last a decade, or rather, until the next presidency, the US troops will go back, and a similar (or even worse) regime will be put in place.
I don’t get it. Please explain?
now i see how bad things going to north korea scenario. so what is better to live 4 generations of people in north korea or few years of turbulence?
for person who was intrested all was clear 25 years ago, were country was going. from these, 20 years were pleasing dictator by world. after is not better (even after his is not pleased anymore).