Hacker News Reader

For what it’s worth, I care more about whether the claims can be independently verified than how the explanation is phrased. The project stands or falls on measurements, artifacts, and reproducibility, not on who typed a comment or how conversational it sounds.

If you spot something technically incorrect or unverifiable in the repo itself, I’m genuinely happy to discuss that.

View on HN

You do realise you didn't actually commit any code, right?

Clarifying, since this is a fair concern:

The full C++ execution core is intentionally not published yet. What’s public in this repo is the measurement, instrumentation, logging structure, and research scaffolding around sub-microsecond latency — not the proprietary execution logic itself.

I should have stated that more explicitly up front.

The goal of the public material is to show how latency is measured, verified, and replayed, rather than to ship a complete trading engine. I’m happy to discuss methodology or share deeper details privately with interested engineers.

Appreciate the pushback — it’s valid.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com