Hamming's essay isn't about inventing something no-one's come up with before.
Hamming's essay is about doing great work, solving important problems, and having significance.
He provides explicit definitions for what those things are in the essay, as I did in my response. As such, none of your flippant retorts make sense within the context of either the essay or my initial response to you.
I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.