Thanks for mentioning this. I always find it unsettling when I've researched solutions for something and only find a better option from a random HN comment.
Site: https://kubb.dev/
Site: https://kubb.dev/
The only mature, correct, fast option with a fixed cost (since it mostly exists at the type level meaning it doesn't scale your bundle with your API) was openapi-ts. I am not affiliated other than a previous happy user, though I did make some PRs while using it https://openapi-ts.dev/
https://github.com/kubb-labs/kubb
Most of the commits and pull requests are AI. Issues are also seemingly being handled by AI with minimal human intervention.
And yes, current models are amazing at reducing time it takes to push out a feature or fix a bug. I wouldn't even consider working at a company that banned use of AI to help me write code.
PS: It's also irrelevant to whether it's AI generated or not, what matters is if it works and is secure.
How do you know it works and is secure if a lot of the code likely hasn't ever been read and understood by a human?
And you presume that the code hasn't been read or understood by a human. AI doesn't click merge on a PR, so it's highly likely that the code has been read by a human.
So, the project is human enough to annoy me, anyway.