> If rust didn’t provide value to the Linux kernel, there’s no way it would have made out of the experimental phase.
That’s “appeal to authority” fallacy.
That’s “appeal to authority” fallacy.
The people who decided rust has value in the kernel are linux kernel developers. Ie, traditional C developers who see value in using rust in linux. Rust in linux has caused plenty of headaches. If rust didn't add commensurate value to make the trouble worth it, it wouldn't be getting adopted.
- Actually, The collective Linux Kernel found that it was good enough to graduate from the experimental ph—
- Aha! You are appealing to the authority of the Linux Kernel. That’s a fallacy.