And yet I keep seeing people comparing it with Copenhagen, as if they were the only two explanations.
For those who don't click through:
- It's a Nature news feature from July 2025, including responses from 1100 people with papers in quantum physics
- 36% preferred the Copenhagen interpretation, and nearly half of those indicated "not confident"
- 17% epistemic theories, 15% many-worlds, 7% Bohm-de Broglie pilot wave theory
- small percentages for various others including "none"
- additional charts for related questions
Everett’s interpretation has postulates that have been well established and tested and its much more likely to be true.
Plus it’s not like is a popularity test. Some surveys of different populations of physicists do have it taking higher.