When someone says "AIs aren't really thinking" because AIs don't think like people do, what I hear is "Airplanes aren't really flying" because airplanes don't fly like birds do.
If so, yes, they're thinking
If I throw some braincells into a cup alongside the dice, will they think about the outcome anymore than the dice alone?
That's not what we have here.
"It is only a fallacy if you "P, therefore C" which GP is not (at least to my eye) doing."
Some people are willfully blind.
"A.I. and humans are as different as chalk and cheese."
As aphorisms are a good way to think about this topic?