Hacker News Reader

Is this the 'g' factor? What studies do you find compelling? Any done after the early 1900s or on adults?

So you've got nothing to offer?

I answered your question clearly and in good faith.

The rest of your diatribe is US styled epistemic theatre I don't feel the need to engage with, so I didn't.

What exactly did your posts contribute?

You provided nothing but unsupported claims. Nobody else is doing your research for you.

It's the scientific consensus not somebody's pet theory. So you don't need to get answers from here, you can get them from Google.

It's the consensus among g-theorists. "The scientific consensus" on cogntive function is Not A Thing.

Are you really lmgtfy-ing on Hacker News?