The reality is that by now we should already be at a level where common programming would be like Wolfram everywhere.
Maybe agents and LLM driven code generation is how we eventually get into the next abstraction level, sadly won't be without casualties with smaller team sizes, when so much can be automated away.
What aspects of the Wolfram language should be everywhere? The easy access to lots of datasets? The easy access to lots of mathematical functions? CAS in general?
Basically the ideas of Smalltalk and Lisp Machine variations, that are still only partially available in modern IDEs, and proudly ignored by the "vt100 rules and vi first" minded devs.
Reminds me of the “Stop writing Dead Programs” talk. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33270235
Jokes and sales pitches aside. We kinda have that already, we platforms that allow us to run the same code on, x86, arm, wasm… and so on. It’s just there is no consensus on which platform to use. Nor should there be since that would slow progress of new and better ways to program.
We will never have one language to span graphics, full stack, embedded, scientific, high performance, etc without excessive bloat.
Maybe it will someday be good enough, but not today, and probably not for at least 5 years.
Some of those tools aren't yet fully there, but also aren't completely dumb, they get more done in a day, than trying to do the same workflows with classical programming.
Workato, Boomi, Powerapps, Opal,...