No, they’re saying the talented ones, the ones with the most optionality, will be the first to select alternative destinations.
Typical adverse selection problem.
Typical adverse selection problem.
You’re just saying there’s variance in quality and asserting your opinion about where quality exists/doesn’t exist.
Fine.
The fact there is any variance at all means the highest quality people will be deterred first. Adverse selection.
The highest quality of talent is already not being brought in. A very specific pool of people are, and not for reasons of talent.
This is completely unrelated to the question of whether the highest quality people are being brought in.
By analogy: "New York City doesn't have a lot of the greatest restaurants in the country because 90% of the restaurants in New York City are not that great."
It's just logically invalid.
And divorced from reality. There's a reason the top students in the world overwhelmingly come to study in the US (at least up until recently). The US's dominance on this and its downstream effects is absolutely unambiguous and it's frankly silly to suggest otherwise.
"We also have a lot of underqualified Indian H1Bs" is completely irrelevant.
P.S. It's "moot" not "mute"