Canadian government must provide services for blind and deaf people via Teletype or something, so at least state services are covered.
The question is what makes service critical. Is Expedia or Uber critical?
The question is what makes service critical. Is Expedia or Uber critical?
Let me spin it a bit, if a new tech comes along and that results in not being able to use delivery apps like ubereats to get food, that new tech should be considered an infringement of rights.
"New means by which individuals purchase food may not inhibit or otherwise reduce their ability existing means of purchasing food" that's how I'd word it. An uber eats ban is not a new mean of buying food but uber eats itself is. If doordash collaborates with payment card processors for an exclusive payment processing for delivery apps, that would be an infringement for example, because that's new tech/means reducing existing means.