Finetuning an LLM "backbone" (if I understand correctly: a fully trained but not instruction tuned LLM, usually small because students) with OCR tokens bests just about every OCR network out there.
And it's not just OCR. Describing images. Bounding boxes. Audio, both ASR and TTS, all works better that way. Now many research papers are only really about how to encode image/audio/video to feed it into a Llama or Qwen model.
My take is it fits into the general concept that generalist models have significant advantages because so much more latent structure maps across domains than we expect. People still talk about fine tuning dedicated models being effective but my personal experience is it's still always better to use a larger generalist model than a smaller fine tuned one.
>it's still always better to use a larger generalist model than a smaller fine tuned one
Smaller fine-tuned models are still a good fit if they need to run on-premises cheaply and are already good enough. Isn't it their main use case?