Hacker News Reader

Comment by bjourne | Hacker News Reader

Right, the worst case scenario is cold temperatures, transmission problems (say days after a storm), lull, and nuclear and hydro power malfunction. However, it should be pointed out that winters are usually quite windy and there are only a few days per year you get very cold temperatures coupled with nearly no wind at all.

View on HN

"there are only a few days per year you get very cold temperatures coupled with nearly no wind at all"

This is a terrible handwave. How many days per year, in the middle of winter, in a cold country, are you OK with having no power?

The system in the article works alongside gas and wood chips heating, so there are other options in place if the sand battery cannot be "charged".

FTA:

> The project will cut fossil-based emissions in the Vääksy district heating network by around 60% each year, by reducing natural gas use bu 80% and also decreasing wood chip consumption.

Not really, we're currently borderline. If OL3 goes down, and it's simultaneously cold over the nordics + northern germany and the baltics, and no wind, our industry will have to shutdown.

This would be an argument for widespread backup power, actually. If every residence had enough backup power to get through 24 hours, it would be far easier to deal with these relatively rare doldrums.

Please read the hn guidelines and reconsider your participation.

Why no power? The forests, hydro dams, heat plants and such that gave power long before wind became a thing are still there.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com