Additionally, even though they're not fully reliable, most popular AI detectors rate this article as 100% human.
You can see this author has been writing similar low-effort listicles and articles since well before ChatGPT came out. The writing style also matches:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200811132340/https://appuals.c...
https://web.archive.org/web/20221021195546/https://www.wepc....
They don't sound like AI. AI sounds like them, because this is exactly the type of content that the LLMs were trained on and tuned to replicate.
Thanks for saving me the read, I wish we(or the HN team) could flag these posts as AI-authored.
It worries me that the "average HNer" doesn't perform independent analysis on even the headlines anymore, but rather the "top comment/flavor of the month" opinion at the top of the discussion.
It is...dangerous to then say "I wish we we could flag these posts as AI-authored"
Dang has done an incredible job with the flagging system, and it is reliant on the shared understanding of the users here that we are all acting in good faith and not performing surface level analysis/criticism.