This article is copied in its entirety from:
http://www.resistradio.com/news/questioning-the-trollocaust-...
as admitted in the intro. Why link to a copy instead of the original?
http://www.resistradio.com/news/questioning-the-trollocaust-...
as admitted in the intro. Why link to a copy instead of the original?
If one of the mods could change the URL to point to the original I'd be grateful.
No, really, I'm curious. What drove you to do this?
Who cares whether he's lying? (And why do you care?)
But why? Can you (or someone) please articulate what exactly is so bad about it?
Some of the best and most influential stories in human history were precisely that: lies presented as truth. Were the authors "bad" for doing this? At what point does it become bad? (And why?)
Drive up the rageviews?
Seems like 'graunwatch' is all about bashing the Guardian and this is an anti-Guardian story kinda?
A more interesting question is does the author know and consent to the wholesale copying? Does that change the story?