I did not say that I only ran the prompt once per attempt. When I say that second time it failed it means that I spent hours to restart, clear context, giving hints, everything to help the model to produce something that works.
Criticizing it for “not being scientific” is irrelevant, I didn’t present it as science. Are people only allowed to share experiences here if they come wrapped in a peer-reviewed paper?
If you want to debate the substance of the observation, happy to. But don’t rewrite what I said into a claim I never made.