How to Model Viral Growth: The Hybrid Model
linkedin.com
linkedin.com
We base our work off of the classical SIR model [3], which we extend to include the possibility of reinfection (since it's possible to become reinfected with a meme after initially losing interest). The key features of the SIR model is a rate of infection proportional to the social interaction between infected and susceptible individuals, where infected individuals gradually lose interest (or not, depending on how the parameters are set).
With appropriate values for parameters, our model can very closely fit the characteristic curves from viral infections, particularly those with an initial large spike followed by a gradual taper, as you can see from these Google Trends data [4]. The model can also be used to predict future infection levels (assuming no change in system dynamics).
[1] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0307904X11...
[2] http://stash.synchroverge.com/files/viral_memetic_model.pdf
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmental_models_in_epidemi...
[4] http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=two%20girls%20one%20c...
Maybe I'm not the target audience for this article though.
Here's my intended sequence: for the next post, I'll model retention as a simple loss rate. After that I'll model retention with a curve over time. And after that I'll model the viral factor itself as a curve over time.
Is there something in particular you think it'd be interesting to cover?
I find that most teams start exactly where this article starts - modeling total installs over time using constant virality. They then realize they care more about active users, and do the same for retention, then realize that retention and virality change over time, and do a cohort model.
Jumping to the end is likely to confuse people who haven't already organically gone through this process. I was also a little underwhelmed at first read, so some mention of the plan in future posts would help us know where you are going.
--Some famous guy. =]