BAQL: Reading Hacker News as a non-CS liberal arts graduate
bayareaquarterlife.tumblr.com
bayareaquarterlife.tumblr.com
It's literally just a funny picture. I love me some funny pictures, but not on Hacker News. Can we please keep this Reddit-style stuff from becoming a thing? I come here to read interesting things, not to browse through funny pictures for cheap laughs.
I usually avoid the facebook/twitter/google/ms/apple/stocks stuff because I don't give a crap and am not a fanboy but I like most of the rest. The signal/noise ratio is still extremely high on HN for me (it was higher when I started lurking, though). If it's too low for you, why do you inflict yourself all this suffering?
Metafilter is also a place with a very high SNR for me but not for technology-oriented stuff.
And, of course, Reddit's promotion algorithm is anti-content.
But, that's just reading the articles. Much of the value of reading HN is reading the discussions, and for myself, even more of the value I find in HN is participating in those discussions.
As a Liberal Arts graduate, I use HN to improve my writing. The constraints imposed by the topic and the feedback provided by the karma system help. Interaction with some really fucking smart people who write well helps even more.
Which reminds me that as parody the article falls flat - no article about Apple's latest at the top of the HN front page.
Instead, I believe the artist was attempting to communicate that a great number of the stories that are posted to HN embody a litany of subjective, semi-defensible, jargon-filled articles that don't quite meet the bar of objective, defensible information and/or positions expected by (and drilled into) those who have a liberal arts degree.
Perhaps I'm reading a bit too much into the comic and granting it insinuation that's not there (granted, my degree & grad work was in history and philosophy, so I could be off on the author's intention and reading in my own subjective interpretation), but it struck me as the author saying the typical HN post is far less technical and objective than one might expect it to be, and far more subjectively opinionated on various topics. With a dash of overreactive emotional polemics in response to change.