>were too dangerous to handle

Too dangerous to handle or too dangerous for openai's reputation when "journalists" write articles about how they managed to force it to say things that are offensive to the twitter mob? When AI companies talk about ai safety, it's mostly safety for their reputation, not safety for the users.

Do you have a link that explains in more detail what was kept away from whom and why? What you wrote is wide open to all kinds of sensational interpretations which are not necessarily true, ir even what you meant to say.