Hacker News Reader

Comment by drgath | Hacker News Reader

Right, but none of that has any effect on your own tweet stream (unless you follow spammers).

If you are talking about searching, the only way search is valuable is if a service gains critical mass, and the only way that happens is if the barrier to entry is low enough that enough users join the service, which will include spammers.

View on HN

Actually, you can be @-messaged or direct messaged even by people you don't follow, so spammers still have an in.

Spammy @mentions is what blocking is for. Also, you don't get @mention notifications if you don't follow them (see settings. may or may not be enabled by default).

You can only DM people where you both follow each other.

I'm assuming that "spam" is largely either @spam or follow-spam. Also, I suspect that blocking @mention after @mention gets a little old after a while.

It takes half a second to block, and how often do you actually have to block people? I block maybe 1 or 2 / week.

I get almost a dozen spam mentions or mentions directed at a misspelled username everyday. That adds a lot of overhead to my usage that get old to the point where I don't even want to read my mentions steam anymore. Certainly less frequently than I used to.

I'm @derek on Twitter, so I have the same issue. If App.net ever got popular, these names would have the exact same issue. So, that's not a compelling reason to switch.

> Also, you don't get @mention notifications if you don't follow them

Most of the people I follow on Twitter I found in this way. An echo chamber is not what I go to Twitter for.

Actually, I think the quality of your stream will improve. People value things more if they pay for it. In this case, you pay for being a part of a community. It is expected that people will try to keep/improve the quality of the community.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com