The obvious economics of preserving the Amazon
economist.com
economist.com
With corrupt governments, this will only be done if it is personally profitable for the ruler.
Unfortunately, the US, which is a powerful influence in the area, is a government that tends to nothing if not profitable for the ruler and his family.
Fixed that for you.
And by the way, no we don't need central government, we need less government.
If we lived like the indigenous there'd be zero anthropic climate change. We will burn all the petroleum until there is no more.
While ignoring those who know how to live without it: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/live/2025/nov/14/cop...
It's all a fraud.
I'm also not sure that us all living like people who are not indigenous to places like Europe, China, or India actually results in a better world, though I do agree that it's one without anthropic climate change.
You're imagining a state that's stable but not one connectable to the present day. We need central government because of the way things are, not because of the way they could be in an arbitrary reimagining of the world.
If you still think "climate change" is about the climate, please wake up.