I read the gp as saying you should just check the sources, not defending.

I mean here's a weird example. Searching Donald Trump there's the headline

  (1994-06 Wexner Mansion NYC) 
  Donald Trump forced to perform oral sex and physically abused 13-year-old female plaintiff and 12-year-old female. 

Like that sounds weird... DT forced to rape? That doesn't make sense to me. The longer summary reads

  A declaration from Tiffany Doe (pseudonym) testifying that she witnessed Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump sexually abuse a 13-year-old girl and other minors during parties from 1990-2000 in New York City. 

It references House Oversight 025937. The actual document looks much more like that summary. Here's a snippet

  7. It was at these series of parties that I personally witnessed the Plaintiff being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old.

It gets worse so if you want to look further it's Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 2.

So far the paragraph summaries seem to be accurate in my poking around but the headlines are mixing ordering and have other weird errors like this. Anyways, always good to check when things are as serious as this...

Here's the link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/11KzAOYCjxwEhnyrsiBpKM8OGBJp...